THE CLASH OF CULTURESJune 2, 2017
I often refer to Samuel Huntington’s 1996 book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Huntington posited that the world is divided into religious and national entities that would be at odds with each other given the Soviet Union’s fall. The book has been criticized, but I believe it to be correct. In a parallel vein, it’s certainly apt to say that in 2017, America is riven by a clash of cultures.
The 2016 presidential election pitted blue coastal elites against red heartland Americans. Cultural differences played a major role. Many voters took opposite positions less on the economy and foreign relations than on guns, global warming, abortion, and a multi-gender, multi-ethnic America.
If you’ve traveled or lived in a region not your own color, you understand. Differences in culture and perception are a fact of life. This becomes a problem only when two critical factors go ignored. First, being immersed in a culture not your own is perfectly acceptable—if those “opposites” don’t force their preferences on others. Second, Americans share a common culture in many ways. Red and blue, we (if not everyone) love sports. We go to movies and watch TV in all its broadcast forms. We gobble pizza, barbecue on holidays, go to the seashore or lake, hike and bike, honor our troops and take Mom out for Mother’s Day brunch. Conservatives, like liberals, drink wine. Liberals, like conservatives, drink beer. Christians of all political persuasions decorate Christmas trees.
Sadly, red folks and blue folks come into little contact, since the nation lacks a military draft or mandated national service. So, Americans often see only stereotypes. Many adopt a philosophy undercutting the nation’s core beliefs as a democracy. They define different as bad. They consider illegitimate people with cultural preferences not matching their own. The cultural divide leads to a political divide increasingly wide and bitter. Everyone shouts. No one listens.
Two weeks ago, I mentioned the Book of Leviticus. We’re now in the Book of Numbers, but Leviticus remains on my mind. Leviticus 19:18 commands, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Both red and blue types pay lip service to this verse. It demands more.
- LOVE: Actions, not just words, prove the real measure of our intentions and integrity.
- YOUR: The neighbor to whom Leviticus refers is ours, not someone else’s
- NEIGHBOR: In a world grown more interconnected, we must expand our definition of neighbor from those nearest us to those at some distance. We can’t come to the rescue for everyone, but we can respect all people’s inherent worth.
- AS YOURSELF: We cannot complain of prejudice and violence inflicted on us if we devalue, hate or persecute anyone else.
Democrats often vilify conservatives, as Hillary Clinton did in her sorrowful reference to Donald Trump’s “basket of deplorables.” Republicans eagerly point to liberals as “fake Americans” who control “fake news.” Yet most conservatives and liberals want the same things: good jobs, healthcare and education for their families, safety and peace. Because these issues cross cultural lines, good will and effort can help us find a measure of political common ground.
Yes, red and blue states—or communities—will continue to follow diverse cultural imperatives. But a closer look reveals that we’re all different just the same.
You can purchase my novel THE ODD PLIGHT OF ADONIS LICHT directly from me or at Amazon. If you enjoy these posts, suggest to family and friends that they check out davidperlstein.com. Post something on Facebook, too.
To respond, click on “comments” to the right just below the title of this post. Then go to the response space at the bottom of the post.
Nice piece, David. Something you might want to consider:
The key to productive coexistence of competing cultures is a live-and-let-live attitude. Problem is that most people (regardless of political affiliation) maintain the following preference order:
1. I get to impose my views of morality on others;
2. No imposition at all, just live-and-let-live;
3. Others get to impose their views on me.
A relatively small number of us are committed to (2), and will stay there regardless of who is in charge. Most others will favor imposed morality if they consider themselves the majority, and oppose it when they consider themselves the minority.
Which is why whenever asks those of us committed to (2) where we stand in the Christian-vs-gay culture war, we answer: “whoever is playing defense on any given day.”
The question we must ask ourselves is thus, who is playing defense TODAY? And we must continue asking ourselves that question every day, because yesterday’s answer may or may not be applicable today.
I agree that imposing morality is wrong. It can, at times, be a tricky issue.
I value the info on your websites. With thanks.