Last Monday, the comic-strip cat Garfield announced, “I’m a rule follower. Rule number one… The rules don’t apply to me.” That’s funny—in a cartoon. In real life, nonsense. That morning, a Garfield wannabe nearly killed me.
I was crossing the street at Lake and Arguello when a red sedan sped through a red light and made a right turn in front of me. The driver had no use for traffic laws and the common sense behind them. (Disclosure: Ever alert, I heard him coming in time.)
If the driver was experiencing an emergency, he at least could have honked his horn and flashed his blinkers. That would have provided fair warning to other drivers and pedestrians. But Garfield behind the wheel exhibited a clear disregard for other people.
Oh, and where was I walking? To my urologist’s office for a routine follow-up regarding my prostate cancer and treatment several years ago. For the record, my PSA, which disclosing a protein indicating possible cancer, was again undetectable.
A connection exists among the driver, my urologist visit and our present COVID-19 crisis.
For starters, the driver ignored common sense. He didn’t give a damn about anyone but himself.
Continuing: Most people refusing vaccination also defy common sense. They not only expose themselves to COVID but also risk exposing others. They offer a variety of rationales, generally based on a distrust of science. Alternatives? At best—or worst—they offer quackery.
The FDA, CDC, National Institutes of Health and medical scientists—Dr. Anthony Fauci only one among many—study the data. Importantly, they’re qualified to do so. Sure, every individual is entitled to read up on, and listen to, analyses of the latest valid science. That’s a personal duty. But one has to begin with the concept that science and scientists make a difference.
Sadly, distrust of expertise represents a political stance. It’s expressed more by people less-educated, highly conservative. Such anti-science views tend to be fatal. Roughly 90 percent of current COVID deaths occur among the non-vaccinated.
Healthy skepticism has a role to play in our lives. Sometimes, however, it crosses from one discipline to another and serves us poorly. Richard Hanania, president of the Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, and a research fellow at Defense Priorities, wrote an interesting opinion piece in last Monday’s New York Times: “’Just Trust the Experts,’ We’re Told. We Shouldn’t.”
Read past the headline. Hanania wasn’t commenting on vaccines but on Afghanistan. His view: Many geopolitical “experts” had no way to predict the outcome of that war. Agreed.
Subjective views drive foreign policy. You can disagree with geopolitical mavens while accepting objective scientific conclusions—and understanding that science often changes conclusions when presented with new data.
I’m alive today—or at least not suffering the ravages of prostate cancer which, treated late, will kill 34,000 American men this year—because I trust the medical experts. And yes, diagnoses can be wrong. I questioned my urologist, did my reading, consulted with Carolyn and came up with the best course of action for me.
I find no problem accepting advice from those who know more than I do—about science or safe driving and safe walking. Wider use of common sense could make individuals— and our nation—a lot healthier.
Found this post interesting? Please pass it.